Recent Additions
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Publication
    Sexuelle Belästigung im Hochschulkontext
    Sexuelle Belästigung im Hochschulkontext ist ein weit verbreitetes, jedoch oft nicht gemeldetes Problem. Das EU-geförderte Forschungsprojekt Uni4Equity untersucht, wie Hochschulen ihre Strukturen, Präventionsmaßnahmen und Reaktionsmechanismen verbessern können, um sexuelle Belästigung effektiver zu erkennen, zu erfassen und ihr entgegenzuwirken. Dieser Beitrag präsentiert die ersten Forschungsergebnisse der initialen Projektphase an der Hochschule Burgenland und stellt darauf aufbauend Handlungsempfehlungen für Hochschulen vor. Neben der Verbesserung von Meldeprozessen und einer verstärkten Sichtbarmachung von Ansprechpersonen ist die Implementierung gezielter Schulungen für Studierende und Mitarbeitende essenziell. Erste Maßnahmen innerhalb des Projekts Uni4Equity zeigen, dass Sensibilisierung und strukturelle Anpassungen das Bewusstsein und die Handlungsmöglichkeiten der Mitglieder der teilnehmenden Hochschulen bereits positiv beeinflussen konnten. Dennoch bleiben langfristige Herausforderungen bestehen, insbesondere in Hinblick auf die nachhaltige Verankerung einer „Culture of Care“.
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Publication
    Strengthening universities response to sexual harassment with an equity approach: the UNI4EQUITY mixed-methods study protocol
    (2025-07)
    Vives-Cases, Carmen
    ;
    Berbegal Bernabeu Marina
    ;
    Pérez Martínez Vanesa
    ;
    Neves, Sofia
    ;
    Muñoz-Haba, Aitana
    ;
    Van de Velde, Sarah
    ;
    Jaskulska, Sylwia
    ;
    Porru, Stefano
    ;
    Carta, Angela
    ;
    De Cuyper Anneleen
    ;
    Carrasco José Miguel
    ;
    Manchenko, Maryna
    ;
    Jankowiak, Barbara
    ;
    ;
    Preventing online and offline sexual harassment (SH) is a public health priority, due to its worldwide magnitude and short- and long-term consequences to the victims and survivors. Universities are environments that may facilitate different forms of conflicts, including SH, but they also play a key role in preventing and addressing them. This paper describes ‘Uni4Equity’, a European project funded by the CERV-2022-DAPHNE Programme of the European Union (Ref. 101094121-Uni4Equity) aimed to reinforce universities’ readiness to identify, map and respond to online and offline SH at workplace and other relevant settings (classrooms, digital space), with an explicit (but not exclusive) focus on minority social groups. More specifically, the project will address the research needs of conducting multidimensional diagnosis of SH at universities (scale and determinants) as a basis for preventive actions; assessing the effectiveness of preventive interventions such as social media campaigns and training workshops; creating a university culture that actively rejects SH; improving access to existing support services; and contributing to the acknowledgement of universities as an asset in preventing this issue.
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Publication
      7
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Publication
      5
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Publication
    “Put Yourself in the Other Person’s Shoes”: University Community’s Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Active Bystander Intervention in Sexual Harassment
    (2025-10-18)
    Esther Ríos-Albert
    ;
    Marina Berbegal-Bernabeu
    ;
    Sylwia Jaskulska
    ;
    Barbara Jankowiak
    ;
    Francesca Dal Maso
    ;
    Stefano Porru
    ;
    Sofie Avery
    ;
    Anneleen De Cuyper
    ;
    Mafalda Sousa
    ;
    Sofia Neves
    ;
    ; ;
    Carmen Vives-Cases
    Bystanders play a key role in detecting, preventing, and addressing sexual harassment (SH) and other forms of gender-based violence (GBV) in university settings. This study aims to explore attitudes toward the factors that either facilitate or hinder individuals from actively intervening in situations of SH and GBV. A qualitative approach with semi-structured interviews was conducted between November 2023 and April 2024 with 89 key informants from universities in Austria, Belgium, Italy, Poland, Portugal, and Spain. Thematic analysis identified four main categories: knowledge and awareness, bystanders’ evaluation of costs and benefits, perceptions of institutional responses, and interpersonal/community factors. Findings revealed that a lack of knowledge about SH, particularly non-physical forms, was a major barrier. Increased awareness, ability to recognize signs of discomfort, self-confidence, and knowledge of support resources were key facilitators. Lack of empathy and solidarity, and fears of social judgment or professional consequences, hindered intervention, especially in situations involving power imbalances. Conversely, protective measures, such as guarantees of confidentiality were crucial in encouraging intervention. These findings highlight the need to raise awareness, create safe environments, and promote prosocial attitudes to foster a culture of active bystander intervention.
      2
Most viewed
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Journal
    Procedia Computer Science
    (Elsevier)
      65625  55
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Journal
    Economic Research
    (Routledge)
      46549  46
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Person
    Scopus© Cited By 61  6Scopus© H-Index 3  46362  14
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Person
    Scopus© H-Index 6  9Scopus© Cited By 97  39778  76
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Person
      39567  33